W13-2106 |
efficiently in practice using
|
branch-and-cut
|
with cutting planes . Kuznetsova
|
W10-2913 |
used as the initialization of a
|
branch-and-cut
|
framework . Here one first tries
|
P04-1051 |
real-life instances , and thus the
|
branch-and-cut
|
trees remain small . The LP bounds
|
P04-1051 |
algorithms . To keep the size of the
|
branch-and-cut
|
tree small , our algorithm employs
|
W10-2913 |
hillclimb - ing . If during the
|
branch-and-cut
|
process tighter upper bounds
|
W10-2913 |
possibility of setting a limit on the
|
branch-and-cut
|
process , either on the running
|
W10-2913 |
solutions . We use the well-known
|
branch-and-cut
|
method , but also show how it
|
P04-1051 |
difference in the size of the
|
branch-and-cut
|
tree and thus in the solution
|
P04-1051 |
have demonstrated that modern
|
branch-and-cut
|
algorithms for GATSP can easily
|
P04-1051 |
linear program ( ILP ) and uses the
|
branch-and-cut
|
method ( Nemhauser and Wolsey
|
P04-1051 |
To solve such an ILP using the
|
branch-and-cut
|
method , we drop the integrality
|
W10-2913 |
type I and there are variants of
|
branch-and-cut
|
that can exploit these proper
|
P04-1051 |
SCIL can be used with different
|
branch-and-cut
|
core codes . We used CPLEX 9.0
|
W10-2913 |
influence the run-times of the
|
branch-and-cut
|
framework are vast : there are
|
W10-2913 |
guarantee , in practice the applied
|
branch-and-cut
|
framework is fast enough to find
|
P04-1051 |
for implementing the ILP-based
|
branch-and-cut
|
algorithm . SCIL can be used
|
P04-1051 |
purposes ( ILP-FS ) and a commercial
|
branch-and-cut
|
ILP solver ( ILP-CS ) . Our implementations
|
P04-1051 |
for an implementation using a
|
branch-and-cut
|
ILP solver which is free for
|
W10-2913 |
alignments , it suffices to do
|
branch-and-cut
|
on the fertility variables and
|