E03-1051 |
boundaries improves the precision on
|
boundary placement
|
. IB1 attains the best improvement
|
E03-1051 |
difficulties in appropriate phrase
|
boundary placement
|
is the lack of reliable information
|
W13-1407 |
different coding behaviours ( e.g. ,
|
boundary placement
|
frequency ) in Figure 1a . Similarity
|
J97-1002 |
transaction coding would not require
|
boundary placement
|
this precise . OVERVIEW transactions
|
P05-1070 |
the corpus instances . Sentence
|
boundary placement
|
is also sensitive to the syntactic
|
W04-0108 |
to entice more greedy morpheme
|
boundary placement
|
in the raw output , in the hope
|
J94-1002 |
prediction should come before or after
|
boundary placement
|
. Of course , it would also be
|
P03-1062 |
investigate pitch accent and prosodic
|
boundary placement
|
for Dutch , using an annotated
|
E03-1051 |
by six points to 71 ) on phrase
|
boundary placement
|
. 1 Introduction One of the factors
|
P09-1101 |
over all dialogues . 5.2 Random
|
Boundary Placement
|
We used a random number generator
|
P03-1062 |
et al. , 2002 ) and in prosodic
|
boundary placement
|
( Wang and Hirschberg , 1997
|
W04-0110 |
first metric reported , simple
|
boundary placement
|
, considers only utterance-internal
|
H93-1064 |
manipulate accent placement ,
|
boundary placement
|
, and pitch range . Each of these
|
A92-1004 |
altered because of th erroneous
|
boundary placement
|
. An example of mislead ing boundary
|
H93-1064 |
ii ) field-specific accent and
|
boundary placement
|
, and ( iii ) interactive adaptation
|
N10-1143 |
the same , and it should treat
|
boundary placement
|
errors according to the prominence
|
A92-1004 |
placement . An example of mislead ing
|
boundary placement
|
as assigned by the parser i given
|
W97-1201 |
combination of prominence and phrase
|
boundary placement
|
to cue meaning-specific speech
|
W13-4015 |
mainly due to minor variations in
|
boundary placement
|
, missing labels for small quiet
|