J79-1021 handle time questions " and used a bottom-up analysis method which allowed questions
J09-1006 later step . Both top-down and bottom-up analyses can be broken down into seven
W13-1410 than chick lit . Secondly , a bottom-up analysis is made of specific morphological
J93-3001 expectation-driven analysis with a bottom-up analysis of the information contained
C86-1140 Constituent Match , a kind of bottom-up analysis , a method is developed to analyze
J79-1047 of about 30 words . A differeht bottom-up analysis procedure was used ip the first
E83-1023 This was actually a contrastive bottom-up analysis of the use of conjunctions in
C88-1035 lexical rule is viewed in the bottom-up analysis process as predicting a subject
J09-1006 findings returned by the top-down and bottom-up analyses on the same genre-specific corpus
J83-1005 parallel , and top-down versus bottom-up analysis , and the choice of network nodes
C86-1058 process . Because our system uses bottom-up analysis first ( including syntactic analysis
C90-2034 relation-driven sldmming process shortcuts bottom-up analysis by firs.t using conceptual knowledge
C80-1072 model , then to find a model ( bottom-up analysis ) . The process of instantiation
W13-2406 from rules at each step of the bottom-up analysis driven by this system . A hybrid
N04-4037 bottom-up manner . The motivations for bottom-up analysis are • Full syntactic parsing
W09-0801 for third-weak verbs ) . In the bottom-up analysis ( cf. section 2 ) the effect
C94-1071 example of a simultaneous Top-Down Bottom-Up analysis The previous example might give
J86-1001 canonical sentoid strategy : a bottom-up analysis that took every N-V combination
W00-1212 NTP , AP , FP , VP of level 1 by bottom-up analysis ; 4 ) Identification LP , PP
W00-1212 NTP , AP , FP , VP of level 2 by bottom-up analysis ; 6 ) Dependency parsing with
hide detail