W15-3304 of most categorial grammars is argument composition . However , unlike most categorial
E95-1024 the phrase structure rule for argument composition discussed in 2.2 . Space limitations
W15-3304 second composition rule Ab is an argument composition rule taking a succeeding argument
W11-3404 relative clauses ( with different argument composition ) are captured with specialized
P11-1107 analysis uses the same technique as argument composition . The difference is that the
P06-3013 phenomenon could be explained by argument composition . Head nodes of the extracted
W15-3304 rules R is described below . 3.1 Argument composition The basic operation of most categorial
W03-2403 lexical rules and/or techniques like argument composition which are very complicated .
E95-1024 our phrase structure rule for argument composition . 3.2 Processing Head The optimal
C94-2130 mechanism frequently referred to as argument composition or argument inheritance . Recently
C94-2130 we have good reason to assume argument composition present in the theory , regardless
C94-2130 -LSB- \ -RSB- J LEX + The finite argument composition verb zag selects a singular nominative
C94-2130 own list of arguments through " argument composition " ( \ -LSB- H&N ( 1989 )
C94-2130 governing auxiliary will apply argument composition and raise all the complements
E95-1024 the rule not only to be used for argument composition construc - tions , as discussed
W15-2122 Grimshaw and Mester , 1988 ) , or argument composition ( Hinrichs and Nakazawa , 1990
P95-1024 complementation , it can be shown that the Argument Composition approach of Hinrichs & Nakazawa
E95-1024 Mary ? " for which we adopt the argument composition analysis presented in Hinrichs
C02-1034 feature for WH-movement , and argument composition for Clause Union ; cf. Sag &
C94-2130 behaviour of auxil - iaries , and argument composition in German constructions with
hide detail