C96-1096 |
class structure coupled with class
|
agreement marking
|
in dependent con - stituents
|
W06-1507 |
strictly bounded dependency like
|
agreement marking
|
, argument realization , or reflexive
|
J02-2002 |
the semantics of possession and
|
agreement marking
|
coming from the lexicon . aids
|
W15-5302 |
simple tense and the past tense
|
agreement markings
|
are treated as inflectional elements
|
E14-1032 |
by an increase in case and/or
|
agreement marking
|
. This is due to a very high
|
W06-0604 |
and the verb , in the form of
|
agreement marking
|
( Croft 2003 ) . Besides formal
|
W15-5302 |
only a slight modification : the
|
agreement markings
|
are carried ( mostly ) by syntactic
|
C00-2168 |
-LSB- ! iect , etc. ) marking ,
|
agreement marking
|
, nouil phrase structure pattern
|
W15-5302 |
ii ) the fact that there are no
|
agreement markings
|
used in the third person . As
|
W96-0408 |
English requires a subject-verb
|
agreement marking
|
( " + s " ) on most verbs in
|
W15-5302 |
. In order to ensure that the
|
agreement marking
|
appears somewhere in the structure
|
W15-5302 |
builds on ( i ) an observation that
|
agreement markings
|
are much more closely bound to
|
J02-2002 |
semantics of possession but that of
|
agreement marking
|
) . Not knowing how many of the
|
C00-2168 |
verb marking ) , clause element
|
agreement marking
|
, clause boundary marking , and
|
C94-1040 |
a plural form verb , the verb
|
agreement marking
|
is left blank for the entry .
|
W06-1507 |
category , and that the presence of
|
agreement marking
|
on the verb indicates an IP cat
|
C00-2168 |
oMer , clause element marking ,
|
agreement marking
|
, etc. ) and the lefi-lmnd side
|